India Scraps Sanchar Saathi Mandatory Pre-Installation: Apple, Privacy Advocates Celebrate Government Reversal

Apple: India’s Department of Telecommunications has abruptly reversed its contentious directive requiring smartphone manufacturers to pre-load the Sanchar Saathi cyber safety application on all new devices sold in the country. The dramatic policy reversal, announced on December 3, 2025, represents a significant victory for Apple, Samsung and digital rights organizations who fiercely opposed the government’s surveillance-like mandate.

The original order, issued on November 28, 2025 but only made public on December 2, 2025 required all smartphone makers to pre-install the state-run app with the explicit stipulation that users could not “disable, delete or restrict” it. This unprecedented directive sparked immediate controversy and international attention, drawing comparisons to surveillance practices in authoritarian nations.

Within days, the government cited “increasing acceptance” of the voluntary app and claimed public support justified withdrawing the mandatory installation requirement. However, industry experts and digital advocates recognize the reversal as direct consequence of Apple’s refusal to comply and the political pressure generated by privacy advocates.

What Was Sanchar Saathi.? Understanding the Controversial Cyber Safety App

Sanchar Saathi, launched in January 2025, represents India’s comprehensive response to the nation’s massive telecom fraud problem affecting its 1.2 billion mobile users. The platform functions as a consumer protection mechanism designed to combat SIM card fraud, device theft, and sophisticated telecom-based scams that cost Indian citizens billions annually.

The App’s Stated Purposes

· Verify IMEI (International Mobile Equipment Identity) authenticity to prevent stolen device usage

· Report suspected fraud calls, messages and suspicious telecom services

· Block or track lost or stolen smartphones

· Check mobile connections registered under users’ names

· Curb duplicate or spoofed IMEI numbers exploited by criminal networks

· Facilitate immediate fraud information sharing between telecom companies and law enforcement

According to government statistics, the voluntary app achieved remarkable adoption metrics before the mandatory directive sparked backlash: 14 million users, 2,000 frauds reported daily and 600,000 new registrations on a single Tuesday—representing a ten-fold increase in uptake.

However, technical analysis revealed that achieving these security functions required requesting extensive permissions that raised serious privacy concerns among cybersecurity experts.

Why Apple and Samsung Rejected India’s Mandatory Pre-Installation Demand

Apple’s resistance to India’s directive transcended typical corporate policy disagreement, reflecting fundamental incompatibility between the company’s privacy-first architecture and the government’s mandatory app requirement.

Apple’s Core Objections

Apple has never pre-installed government-developed applications on iPhones globally, maintaining this principle even when complying with other government regulations. The company’s stated policy prohibits any mandatory software that users cannot remove, as this fundamentally undermines user consent and device security.

“The mandate raises privacy and security concerns and contradicts our long-standing global principle of never pre-installing government apps on devices,” sources told Reuters, explaining Apple’s position. The company planned to formally communicate its inability to comply with Indian authorities, citing both technical impossibility and policy constraints.

Samsung and Other Manufacturers’ Concerns

Samsung, Xiaomi, Vivo, and other major Android manufacturers similarly resisted the directive, though less publicly than Apple. Industry executives warned that pre-installing undeletable government apps would

· Damage global user trust and brand reputation

· Create operational complexities requiring different device configurations for India versus export markets

· Trigger regulatory scrutiny from privacy watchdogs in Europe, North America, and other markets

· Establish dangerous precedent encouraging similar demands from other governments

Samsung representatives communicated privately that complying would require unprecedented operating system modifications, while concerns over device-level access to sensitive identifiers could invite international regulatory action.

The Privacy Nightmare: Why Cybersecurity Experts Warned Against Mandatory Installation

Digital rights advocates and cybersecurity professionals expressed alarm not about Sanchar Saathi’s current functionality but about the structural vulnerabilities created by mandatory, undeletable government software on personal devices.

Key Technical Concerns

System-Level Access Requirements: For the app to remain undeletable and execute its functions reliably, it would require system-level or root-level access identical to carrier or manufacturer system applications. This architectural requirement erodes protection mechanisms that normally prevent individual apps from accessing other applications’ data.

Permission Requests: The Sanchar Saathi app requests extensive permissions including,

· Reading and sending SMS messages

· Accessing call logs and phone numbers

· Retrieving device identity and serial numbers

· Monitoring whether calls are active and connection details

· Camera access to scan IMEI barcodes

· Network status visibility

While applications like Truecaller and Zomato request similar permissions, they remain user applications removable at any time. As a pre-installed system app, Sanchar Saathi would access sensitive data without explicit user permission for each request.

Automatic Registration Without Consent: The app’s Android version automatically registers phone numbers without explicit user consent and automatically sends registration messages to the Department of Telecommunications. Users have no meaningful opt-out mechanism.

Privacy Policy Deficiencies: The Sanchar Saathi privacy policy provides no mechanism for users to request corrections, lacks explicit data deletion commitments, offers no opt-out option and fails to clarify data retention timelines.

Internet Freedom Foundation’s Warning

The Delhi-based digital rights organization declared: “This converts every smartphone sold in India into a vessel for state-mandated software that the user cannot meaningfully refuse, control or remove...turns Sanchar Saathi into a permanent, non-consensual point of access sitting inside the operating system of every Indian smartphone user.”

Political Uproar: Opposition Parties Compare App to Surveillance Scandals

India’s opposition parties immediately recognized the Sanchar Saathi mandate as an unprecedented attack on citizen privacy and seized on the issue with fierce parliamentary criticism.

Congress Party Response

· Congress leaders compared the government app to previous surveillance scandals and authoritarian practices

o Priyanka Gandhi Vadra declared the mandate “ridiculous,” emphasizing that “citizens have the right to privacy. This isn’t just about snooping on telephones—overall, they are turning this country into a dictatorship”.

o Karti Chidambaram directly referenced international surveillance precedents, stating: “This has been done in Russia and North Korea, and now they want to snoop on our private photos and videos”.

o Randeep Singh Surjewala argued the app could enable real-time location tracking, unauthorized call and message monitoring, and effectively transform every smartphone into a government surveillance device.

Shiv Sena Criticism

Opposition legislator Priyanka Chaturvedi characterized the mandate as “another Big Boss surveillance moment,” referencing India’s reality television show where all activities are monitored—a metaphorical reference to pervasive state surveillance.

Reference to Pegasus Scandal

Multiple opposition figures invoked the 2021 Pegasus spyware scandal, in which an international surveillance tool was used to monitor Indian activists and journalists, as precedent for why mandatory government software on personal devices represents unacceptable risk.

Communications Minister Contradicts Himself: Confusing Official Statements

Telecom Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia’s attempts to defend the app created more confusion than clarity, as his public statements contradicted the government’s actual mandate and each other.

Scindia’s Initial Defense

“Snooping is neither possible nor will it happen with the Sanchar Saathi safety app,” Scindia told Parliament. He maintained that users could “delete it like any other app” and that “every citizen has this right in a democracy”.

However, this contradicted the actual government order, which explicitly prohibited users from disabling, deleting, or restricting the app.

Congressional Opposition Exploitation

Congress MP Deepender Singh Hooda highlighted the contradiction: “The Union Minister said it will be pre-installed. But later he said users can delete it. When a pre-loaded app is deleted, users may not know if all features have been disabled. Is this not an attack on privacy?”.

Scindia’s Revised Statement

When pressed, Scindia clarified that the app would not “operate automatically” unless users explicitly registered, stating: “If the app is on your phone, it does not mean it will operate automatically. Till the user registers in the app, it will not operate”.

This explanation satisfied few critics, as the fundamental concern remained: mandatory, undeletable government software represents structural vulnerability regardless of activation status.

The Dramatic Reversal: Government Cites “Increasing Acceptance”

On December 3, 2025, just days after the mandatory pre-installation directive sparked fierce backlash, India’s Department of Telecommunications abruptly reversed course.

The Government’s Official Justification

The Ministry of Communications released a statement claiming the reversal reflected Sanchar Saathi’s “increasing acceptance” and robust voluntary adoption rates. The government cited statistics showing

· 14 million users downloaded the app voluntarily

· 2,000 frauds reported daily through the platform

· 600,000 new registrations on a single Tuesday (a ten-fold increase in uptake)

· Over 700,000 lost phones recovered through IMEI tracking

“Given Sanchar Saathi’s increasing acceptance, Government has decided not to make the pre-installation mandatory for mobile manufacturers,” the official statement declared.

Industry Observers’ Assessment:

However, technology analysts recognized the reversal as direct capitulation to Apple’s refusal to comply and political pressure from digital rights organizations. The timing—reversing the mandate within days of announcement—revealed that public and corporate resistance not “increasing acceptance,” drove the policy change.

Apple’s Victory: Tech Giant Stands Firm on Privacy Principles

Apple’s refusal to comply with the mandatory pre-installation order, combined with public pressure from digital advocates, directly precipitated India’s policy reversal.

Apple’s Unwavering Position

Apple communicated to Reuters and Indian government authorities that the company would not integrate a government app that users cannot delete from iPhones, as this violates Apple’s fundamental privacy and user-consent standards.

The company explained that this principle applies globally—Apple has never pre-installed government applications on iOS devices anywhere in the world, and India would not represent an exception.

Counterpoint Research Predictions

Analysts predicted Apple would likely negotiate for a middle-ground compromise, such as prominently informing users about the app without enforcing installation. However, even this potential compromise appears unnecessary given the government’s complete reversal.

Digital Rights Victory: Internet Freedom Foundation’s Cautious Optimism

India’s leading digital rights organization, the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF), welcomed the reversal but cautioned that complete closure requires formal legal documentation and independence verification.

IFF’s Statement

“This is a welcome development, but we are still awaiting the full text of the legal order that should accompany this announcement, including any revised directions under the Cyber Security Rules, 2024,” the IFF stated on social media platform X.

“For now, we should treat this as cautious optimism, not closure, until the formal legal direction is published and independently confirmed,” the organization added.

Broader Implications for India’s Digital Rights

The episode represents a significant victory for India’s emerging digital rights movement, demonstrating that coordinated resistance from technology companies, civil society organizations and opposition political parties can constrain government overreach.

However, observers warn that India’s broader trajectory toward digital surveillance and state control of personal technology continues through other initiatives including SIM-binding requirements for messaging apps and expanded telecom regulatory authority.

Impact Analysis: What This Reversal Means for Global Tech Governance

The Sanchar Saathi saga carries implications extending far beyond India, establishing precedent about whether technology companies and civil society can successfully resist government mandates for surveillance infrastructure.

Victory for Privacy-Conscious Design

Apple’s refusal to compromise on its privacy principles, combined with successful mobilization of digital rights organizations and opposition political parties, demonstrated that corporations and civil society possess tools to resist problematic government mandates.

Potential Precedent Concerns

Simultaneously, the episode revealed the dangerous trajectory of government demands for device-level control. If India had successfully imposed mandatory pre-installation, authoritarian governments in Russia, China and other nations might aggressively pursue similar models, transforming personal smartphones into surveillance devices.

Questions Remaining About India’s Digital Governance

While the mandatory pre-installation requirement has been scrapped, India’s broader regulatory apparatus continues advancing measures that centralize government control over telecommunications and digital communications. The SIM-binding requirement for messaging apps, combined with expanded telecom regulatory authority, suggests India may pursue surveillance through alternative mechanisms.

Conclusion: A Temporary Reprieve in India’s Surveillance Evolution

India’s reversal of the Sanchar Saathi mandatory pre-installation order represents a significant but temporary victory for digital rights and privacy advocates.

Apple’s firmness, combined with fierce opposition from digital rights organizations and India’s opposition political parties, succeeded in forcing the government to abandon an unprecedented surveillance mandate.

However, the episode illuminates India’s broader regulatory trajectory toward increased state monitoring of digital communications, device-level control, and telecommunications surveillance. While the mandatory app requirement has been withdrawn, India’s government continues advancing alternative mechanisms to achieve comprehensive digital oversight.

For Apple and technology companies worldwide, the victory validates the principle that even powerful governments can be constrained when faced with coordinated resistance from technology corporations, civil society organizations and democratic institutions.

For Indian citizens and digital rights advocates, cautious optimism remains appropriate until India’s government formally publishes revised legal directives and complete transparency emerges about future surveillance initiatives.

Call to Action (CTA)

India’s digital privacy remains under threat despite this temporary victory. Technology companies, civil society organizations and citizens must remain vigilant as governments worldwide seek new mechanisms for surveillance and device-level control.

Support organizations like the Internet Freedom Foundation that defend digital rights. Demand transparency from government about surveillance initiatives. Use privacy-respecting technologies and understand your digital rights. Follow The Daily Hints for continuous updates on digital privacy, technology policy and government surveillance developments.

Follow and share The Daily Hints for comprehensive coverage of digital rights, privacy concerns and technology policy that affects billions of smartphone users worldwide.

Follow The Daily Hints on Social Media,

§ Facebook

§ Instagram

§ Threads

§ WhatsApp

§ YouTube

§ Twitter

§ Email ID

From West Bengal District’s News to Kolkata News, Other States News to Whole India News, International News, Entertainment News to Sports News, Science News to Technology News and all other news updates, follow and Support our news portal @TheDailyHints.